Optical Attenuation Meter YOKOGAWA

Why do optical loss measurement results in the lab and in the field often differ?

In laboratory conditions, the system is tightly controlled: stable light source, high-quality patchcords, clean connectors, and minimal temperature fluctuations. This ensures that optical loss measurement results have very small errors, usually within ±0.1 dB.

However, in the field, environmental factors such as dust, humidity, vibration, and even quick handling by engineers all affect the results. A dirty connector or an excessively bent cable can increase loss by several dB compared to the lab value. Therefore, the difference between lab and field is inevitable, and engineers need to understand this in order to evaluate data properly rather than assuming the equipment is wrong.

Can Optical Attenuation Meter really replace OTDR and Power Meter in network maintenance?

Optical Attenuation Meter is designed to accurately measure the linear loss of a transmission channel. Meanwhile, OTDR meter is suitable for locating breaks, splices, or reflection issues; while a Power Meter is a quick tool for measuring power at a single point.

In network maintenance, if the requirement is only to know whether the signal meets standards, the Loss Test Set provides more direct and reliable results. But to pinpoint faults or identify unusual loss locations, the OTDR remains an irreplaceable tool. Therefore, the Optical Loss Test Set is not a complete replacement, but rather a mandatory complement in a comprehensive test toolkit.

What are the limits of optical loss measurement accuracy when deployed on DWDM/5G backhaul systems?

DWDM and 5G backhaul systems require extremely tight loss control, where even a 0.2–0.3 dB difference can affect OSNR or Q-factor. High-end Optical Loss Test Sets allow resolution up to 0.01 dB, but in practice, maintaining such accuracy depends heavily on the quality of reference cables and handling methods.

On DWDM routes spanning hundreds of kilometers, engineers need to perform bi-directional measurements to eliminate errors caused by connectors or launch conditions. The practical limit of measurement is not only determined by the technical specifications of the device, but also by strict adherence to standardized measurement procedures according to ITU-T or IEC.

Common handling errors that often cause optical loss measurements to deviate by several dB

A common mistake is not cleaning the optical connector before plugging in, as small amounts of dust and grease can significantly increase loss. In addition, using low-quality patchcords or ones that have undergone multiple splices or bends can also make measurement values unstable.

Another mistake is measuring only in one direction, leading to results affected by connectors with asymmetric loss characteristics. Finally, many field engineers overlook the stabilization time of the light source, resulting in fluctuating initial data that does not accurately reflect the real network condition.

Conclusion:

The above are in-depth analyses of the causes of the difference in optical loss measurements between the laboratory and the field, the complementary role of optical loss meters as well as measurement limitations in DWDM/5G systems.

If you are looking for genuine optical loss meters, with a variety of models from handheld to desktop, EMIN currently offers many suitable options for the field and the laboratory. Refer to the document of the Optical Attenuation Meter product catalog at EMIN to choose the most suitable device for your development and maintenance needs.